ACS NSQIP-IBD Collaborative

Advancing IBD Surgical Outcomes Across 30 Centers Nationwide

0 Total Cases
0 Active Sites
0 Publications
0 Years of Data
Participating Institutions

What is ACS NSQIP-IBD?

The ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program—Inflammatory Bowel Disease (NSQIP-IBD) Collaborative is the first disease-specific module within ACS-NSQIP. Launched in 2017, it captures IBD-specific surgical variables not available in standard NSQIP, enabling large-scale, multicenter outcomes research in inflammatory bowel disease surgery.

Disease-Specific Variables

5 validated IBD-specific data points captured prospectively at each site

Multicenter Registry

29 high-volume IBD surgery centers across the United States

14,823 Cases

The largest prospective IBD surgical outcomes dataset worldwide

7 Publications

Peer-reviewed studies in DCR, IBD, and Am J Surg

2017
Collaborative launched with 13 founding centers
2019
Validation study published—5 variables, kappa ≥0.68
2020
Expanded to 24 sites, new variables added (DVT, biologics detail)
2023–2025
6 major publications in DCR covering frailty, biologics, VTE, sex differences, LOS, and more
2026
30 active sites, 14,823 cases, 5 new sites onboarded (Northwell, Henry Ford, Mayo Rochester, Mayo Florida, UVA)

30 Sites Across the Nation

Established Site New 2026

By the Numbers

IBD Diagnosis

CD — 1,991 (67.9%)
UC — 894 (30.5%)
IBD-U — 49 (1.7%)

Biologic Use (60d Pre-Op)

Yes — 5,258 (35.5%)
No — 5,626 (38.0%)
Not Answered — 3,810

IPAA Creation

Yes — 1,043 (29.7%)
No — 2,471 (70.3%)

Top Procedures (CPT Codes)

Lap ICR
2,984 (20.1%)
Lap STC
1,657 (11.2%)
Open ICR
1,481 (10.0%)
IPAA
1,043 (7.0%)
Open STC
901 (6.1%)
Proctectomy
678 (4.6%)
Segmental
451 (3.0%)

Validated Data Elements

VariableCodeDescriptionStatus
IBD DiagnosisIBDDxCD, UC, IBD-U classification (n = 14,823)Original
Biologic AgentBioMed15 specific biologics + other/more than one (n = 10,884 answered)Original
Immune ModulationImmModImmunomodulator use ≤60 days pre-opOriginal
Ileostomy FormationIleostNew, pre-existing, revised, takedown, or noneOriginal
Colonic DysplasiaDysplDysplasia/neoplasia status at time of surgeryOriginal
Anastomotic ConstructionAnastConstrAnastomosis configuration, construction method, and reinforcement for all surgeriesNew
Retired Variables
IPAA TechniqueAnastTechStapled S2S, hand sewn, Kono-S, EEA, mucosectomy, etc.Retired
DVT LocationDVTLoc9 anatomic DVT categoriesRetired 11/2024
30-Day Bleeding (Transfusion)OTHBLEED30Bleeding requiring transfusion within 30 daysRetired 11/2024
30-Day Bleeding (Procedure)BleedIntBleeding requiring secondary procedureRetired 11/2024
DVT Prophylaxis (Inpatient)DVTAgent10 chemoprophylaxis optionsRetired 11/2024
DVT Prophylaxis (Discharge)DischAgentAgent prescribed at dischargeRetired 11/2024
DVT Agent DurationDVTMedTimeLength of time on primary DVT agentRetired 11/2024

Publications

The ACS NSQIP-IBD Collaborative: Design, Implementation, and Validation
Eisenstein S, Holubar SD, Hilbert N, Bordeianou L, Crawford LA, Hall B, Hull T, et al.
Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019 Foundational
First description of the disease-specific collaborative module within ACS-NSQIP. 13 centers, 956 cases. Five IBD-specific variables validated with excellent agreement (kappa ≥ 0.68).
Better Characterization of Operation for Ulcerative Colitis Through NSQIP-IBD
Luo WY, Holubar SD, Bordeianou L, Cosman BC, Hyke R, Lee EC, Messaris E, et al.
Am J Surg 2021
430 UC patients classified by RPC-IPAA staging. Delayed pouch surgery predicted by higher UC surgery volume (p = 0.01) and absence of colonic dysplasia (p = 0.04). Largest multicenter analysis of immediate vs. delayed IPAA construction.
Conventional Frailty Index Does Not Predict Risk of Postoperative Complications in Patients With IBD
Rozich JJ, Zhao B, Luo J, Luo WY, Eisenstein S, Singh S, on behalf of NSQIP-IBD Collaborative
Dis Colon Rectum 2023
3,172 IBD patients. Modified frailty index was NOT associated with increased risk of severe complications (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 0.81–1.90). Non-elective surgery, weight loss, and corticosteroid use were independent risk factors.
Impact of Preoperative Factors on Postoperative Length of Stay
Hill SS, Ottaviano KE, Palange DC, Chismark AD, Valerian BT, Canete JJ, Lee EC, on behalf of NSQIP-IBD Collaborative
Dis Colon Rectum 2024
3,008 patients, median LOS 4 days. Preoperative hospitalization (OR 13.45) and rectal surgery (OR 2.13) were strongest predictors of extended LOS. Biologic use was NOT significant.
Sex-Based Differences in IBD Surgical Outcomes
Sundel MH, Newland JJ, Blackburn KW, Vesselinov RM, Eisenstein S, Bafford AC, on behalf of NSQIP-IBD Collaborative
Dis Colon Rectum 2024
3,143 patients from 15 centers. Women had 27% lower odds of serious adverse events (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.96). In UC, women had 54% lower odds vs. men; no significant difference in Crohn’s disease.
Biologics Before Surgery Are Not Associated With Postoperative Complications
Holubar SD, Russell T, Neel N, Hull TL, Steinhagen RM, Bordeianou L, Hyman NH, Cohen BL, Eisenstein S, NSQIP-IBD Collaborative
Dis Colon Rectum 2024
2,926 patients with causal inference analysis (IPTW). Biologic exposure within 60 days was NOT associated with postoperative infections (RR 0.97), complications (RR 0.92), or adverse events (RR 0.92). Preoperative biologics are safe.
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Practice Patterns, Outcomes, and Risk Stratification
Holubar SD, Eisenstein S, Bordeianou LG, Chapman WC Jr, et al., on behalf of NSQIP-IBD Collaborative
Dis Colon Rectum 2025
1,797 patients from 17 centers. VTE rate 2.4%. Extended enoxaparin prophylaxis reduced VTE by 74.8% before discharge and 72.6% after. NNT = 54–55 patients to prevent one clot.

SCR Data Collection Guide

This guide covers IBD-specific variable definitions and the data extraction workflow for Surgical Clinical Reviewers participating in the NSQIP-IBD Collaborative. Patients with Ulcerative Colitis (ICD-10: K51.*), Crohn’s Disease (K50.*), or Indeterminate Colitis (K52.3) undergoing surgery are eligible for inclusion.

Download the complete guide: SCR Guide PDF (49 slides)

IBD Diagnosis (IBDDx) — Updated 9/2023

Purpose: While many patients will have their IBD diagnosis as the preop diagnosis for surgery, some may have cancer or bowel obstruction listed instead. This variable allows analysis independent of ICD-10 coding.

Response options:

  • a. Crohn’s Disease (K50.*)
  • b. Ulcerative Colitis (K51.*)
  • c. Indeterminate Colitis / IBD-NOS (K52.3)

Tip: For patients with multiple IBD diagnoses in the chart, use the “postop diagnosis” from the operative report.

Where to find: Operative report, preop H&P, anesthesia record.

Biologic Agent (BioMed)

Purpose: Was the patient on a biologic agent at any point over the 60-day period prior to surgery? This includes but is not limited to the agents listed below.

Response options: No • Yes • Unable to determine

Tracked agents (15+):

  • Anti-TNF: Infliximab (Remicade), Adalimumab (Humira), Certolizumab (Cimzia), Golimumab (Simponi), Infliximab-dyyb (Inflectra), Infliximab-abda (Renflexis)
  • Anti-integrin: Vedolizumab (Entyvio), Natalizumab (Tysabri)
  • Anti-IL-12/23: Ustekinumab (Stelara), Risankizumab (Skyrizi), Guselkumab (Tremfya)
  • JAK inhibitors: Tofacitinib (Xeljanz), Upadacitinib (Rinvoq)
  • S1P modulators: Ozanimod (Zeposia), Etrasimod (Velsipity)

Where to find: Medication reconciliation, preop clinic notes, infusion center records.

Immune Modulation (ImmMod)

Purpose: Was the patient taking immunomodulation therapy at any point over the 60-day period prior to surgery?

Response options: No • Yes • Unable to determine

Agents included:

  • 6-Mercaptopurine (6-MP, Purinethol, Purixan)
  • Azathioprine (Imuran, AZA)
  • Methotrexate (MTX, Trexall, Rasuvo, Folex PFS)

Note: Unlike biologics, there are few new thiopurines entering the market. This list should remain fairly static.

Where to find: Medication reconciliation, preop clinic notes, pharmacy records.

Ileostomy (Ileost)

Purpose: Several CPT codes for IBD surgery include “with or without ileostomy.” This variable clarifies the patient’s ileostomy status at the end of the procedure.

Response options (5 categories):

  • a. None: No ileostomy
  • b. New ileostomy: Patient did not have an ileostomy prior to surgery and completed surgery with one
  • c. Ileostomy from prior is unaltered: Patient had an ileostomy prior to surgery which remained unaltered after
  • d. Conversion of end ileostomy to loop: Patient had an end ileostomy prior to surgery and had formation of a loop ileostomy during
  • e. Other ileostomy revision: All other ileostomy transitions

Tip: Conversion from end to loop is common in completion proctectomy with IPAA after prior subtotal colectomy.

Where to find: Operative report (body text and procedure list).

IPAA Creation

Purpose: For patients undergoing proctectomy, was an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) created during this surgery?

Response options: Yes • No • Not applicable

Applicable CPT codes: 45113, 44158, 44211, 45397

Note: This includes any configuration (J-pouch and S-pouch). CPT 45397 is often used as a surrogate for laparoscopic or robotic completion proctectomy with IPAA, even though its formal definition covers partial proctectomy with colonic J-pouch. This variable helps identify which of these cases are actually IPAAs.

Colonic Dysplasia (Dyspl)

Purpose: Presence or absence of colonic dysplasia or neoplasia at the time of surgery. This is an important surgical indication that is not captured in standard NSQIP.

Response options: Yes • No • Unable to determine

Where to find: Preoperative colonoscopy/pathology reports, operative report.

Anastomotic Construction (AnastConstr) — New

Purpose: Single variable that applies to all IBD surgeries involving anastomosis (replaces the retired IPAA Technique variable). Captures configuration, construction method, and staple line reinforcement.

Key categories:

  • Stapled end-to-end: Circular stapler used (EEA, echelon circular, DST). Look for “anvil” or “spike” in the operative report. Common in IPAA, coloproctostomy, ileoproctostomy.
  • Mucosectomy with hand sewing: Mucosal sleeve dissected to dentate line, pouch hand-sewn. Only in IPAA. Should be clearly dictated.
  • Side-to-side stapled: Functional end-to-end or side-to-side. Common in ileocolic resections.

Where to find: Operative report — detailed description of anastomosis technique.

Anastomosis Technique (AnastTech) — Retired

Previously classified IPAA anastomotic technique (stapled vs. hand-sewn). This variable has been retired and replaced by the broader Anastomotic Construction (AnastConstr) variable, which applies to all anastomoses, not just IPAA.

30-Day Outcome Variables

In addition to standard NSQIP 30-day outcomes, the collaborative tracks several IBD-relevant postoperative variables:

  • Bleeding requiring transfusion (OTHBLEED30): Starting at 72 hours postop through 30 days — did the patient require ≥1 unit pRBC? Includes post-anemia, wound hematoma, retroperitoneal hematoma, GI bleeding.
  • DVT chemoprophylaxis: Type, duration, and compliance with VTE prophylaxis. Found in discharge medication reconciliation, postop notes, and nursing communications.
  • Surgical site infection (SSI): Superficial, deep, and organ-space infections within 30 days.
  • Anastomotic leak: Radiographic or clinical evidence of leak within 30 days.
  • Readmission: Any unplanned readmission within 30 days.

Data Extraction Workflow

Step-by-step process for extracting deidentified data from the NSQIP Resource Portal:

  • 1. Log in to the ACS NSQIP Resource Portal
  • 2. Navigate to Data Reports → Custom Export
  • 3. Filter by ICD-10 codes: K50.* (Crohn’s), K51.* (UC), K52.3 (Indeterminate)
  • 4. Include all subcategories and subdiagnoses within these roots
  • 5. Select all IBD-specific variables + standard NSQIP fields
  • 6. Export to Excel
  • 7. Remove all patient identifier columns (name, MRN, DOB, SSN, etc.)
  • 8. Verify no identifiable information remains
  • 9. Save deidentified Excel file and submit via secure upload to the collaborative coordinator

Submit to: seisenstein@health.ucsd.edu

Coordinator Contact

Samuel Eisenstein, MD — UC San Diego

seisenstein@ucsd.edu

For questions about variable definitions, data extraction, or site enrollment

Collaborative Members

UCSD

UC San Diego

Samuel Eisenstein, Sonia Ramamoorthy, Nicholas Hilbert, Austin Du
San Diego, CA
Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland Clinic

Stefan Holubar, Nancy Anzlovar, Sue Bohne
Cleveland, OH
Baylor

Baylor Scott & White

Sarah Stringfield, Alessandro Fichera, Debbie Aguilar, Martha Mueller
Dallas, TX
MGH

Massachusetts General Hospital

Rocco Ricciardi, Liliana Bordeianou, Hiroko Kunitake, Kristen Hellmuth, Jill Steinberg
Boston, MA
Albany

Albany Medical Center

Edward Lee, Brian Valerian, Megan Keenan, Andrea Goyette
Albany, NY
BIDMC

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Evangelos Messaris, Kristin Crowell, Richard Whyte, Mary Ward
Boston, MA
Lahey

Lahey Hospital & Medical Center

Julia Saraidaridis, Lynne Crawford, Mary Sansone, Nancy Manfredi
Burlington, MA
Penn State

Penn State Health

Jeff Scow, Melissa Boltz, Pam Huggins
Hershey, PA
Emory

Emory University

Jahnavi Srinivasan, Patrick Sullivan, Terrah Paul Olsen, Shamsah Sitafalwalla
Atlanta, GA
WashU

Washington University in St. Louis

Matt Mutch, Michelle Cowan, Deepak Parakkal, Bruce Hall, Mitzi Hirbe
St. Louis, MO
Mount Sinai

Mount Sinai

Randolph Steinhagen, Pat Sylla, Mike Plietz, Celia Divino, Reba Miller
New York, NY
UChicago

University of Chicago

Kinga Skowron, Neil Hyman, Vivek Prachand, Sue Sullivan, Lorice Pullins
Chicago, IL
Iowa

University of Iowa

Jennifer Hrabe, Timothy Kresowik, Michelle Mathias
Iowa City, IA
BWH

Brigham & Women’s Hospital

James Yoo, Joel Goldberg, Jill Steinberg, Felix Akinbami
Boston, MA
UNC

UNC Chapel Hill

Muneera Kapadia, Anila Thomas
Chapel Hill, NC
Rochester

University of Rochester

Lisa Cannon, Sharon Johnson, Rhonda Bell
Rochester, NY
Northwestern

Northwestern University

Vitaliy Poylin, Scott Strong, Kate Paredes, Tami Gilbert
Chicago, IL
BU

Boston University

Jennifer Davids, Samantha Rivard, Odile Germain, Pamela Rosenkranz
Boston, MA
UC

University of Cincinnati

Carla Justiniano, Ian Paquette, Valora Thomas
Cincinnati, OH
UW

University of Washington

Mukta Krane, Tina Schwien, Lisa Phan
Seattle, WA
Hopkins

Johns Hopkins

Andrea Bafford, Miloslawa Stem, Dianne Bettick
Baltimore, MD
Corewell

Corewell Health

James Ogilvie, Amanda Yang, Jeff Brown, Holly Clauser
Grand Rapids, MI
Yale

Yale University

Ira Leeds, Sandra Fillion, Stephanie Fitzgerald, Elizabeth Bernardo
New Haven, CT
Hillcrest

Cleveland Clinic Hillcrest

Rebecca Gunter, Jennifer Miller
Cleveland, OH
Fairview

Cleveland Clinic Fairview

Kristen Ban, Jennifer Miller
Cleveland, OH
Northwell

Northwell Health NEW 2026

Marc Greenwald, Elizabeth Shannon
New Hyde Park, NY
Henry Ford

Henry Ford Health NEW 2026

Megumi Asai, Jesica Derosier
Detroit, MI
Mayo Rochester

Mayo Clinic Rochester NEW 2026

Kristy Rumer, Cynthia Clark
Rochester, MN
Mayo Florida

Mayo Clinic Florida NEW 2026

Luca Stocchi, Krista Alvin
Jacksonville, FL
UVA

University of Virginia NEW 2026

Traci Hedrick, Beth Turrentine
Charlottesville, VA